REHP stands for the
Retire Early Home Page.
We are normally referring to the Retire Early Home Page discussion board at the
Speaker's Corner section of
The Motley Fool (TMF).
There is also a website
www.retireearlyhomepage.com. It was the original site. It contains a wealth of relevant information and it is definitely worth visiting. It was the original site. It was founded by John Greeney who is also know as
intercst. The term intercst refers to a computer program that John Greeney put together when he was gainfully employed. The program shared cost information among several existing programs. Using
no more than 8 letters was required in those days: so that the letters intercst were used instead of intercost.
The Motley Fool's Retire Early Home Page discussion board was also founded by John Greeney. He is the Speaker at Speaker's Corner. He is also the "board general." He wrote the Retire Early Safe Withdrawal Rate Study, which is excellent as a stand alone study. What has happened, however, is that
intercst has restricted any discussion that would build upon his study along lines that he does not favor. He is, for example, adamantly against Real Estate investments in any form. That traces back to when he was convinced to sell some DELL stock to buy REITS in order to diversify. That decision cost him more than a million dollars as an opportunity cost (i.e., to keep holding on to his DELL stock as it soared upwards).
The Motley Fool's posting rules demand a high level of civility. However, the Motley Fool has failed to enforce its own policy when it regards its
board generals. As a result
intercst has encouraged improper actions at certain times, especially when his Retire Early Safe Withdrawal Rate Study's conclusions are challenged. Often, it is the
applicability of certain recommendations in light of new information that causes
intercst to set off an attack mode. The actual process is very subtle. If it only happened two or three times, there wouldn't be any problem. But it happens again and again and again. After you see it happen six or seven times, you begin to understand. It sets forth an unpleasant tone that discourages on topic discussions.
Such behavior is unusual and unexpected...at least, in my experience. It is sad, as well, because
intercst could enjoy a much more prominent status if he simply allowed discussions to continue. He would receive overwhelming praise if he encouraged them.
Have fun.
John R.