The post jwr1945 doesn't want you to see
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2004 7:23 am
a rambling rob bennett post that I copied (in its entirety) yesterday from tmf. sample:
here is a link for those who have tmf access
http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=20622477
My reason for posting it (and I think jwr's reson for asking ES to have it removed) is that it was posted using the same account as this:
http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=20617175
clearly hocus/rob bennett isn't dumb. why he derives enjoyment from being a troll and trying to get people to acknowledge his "insights" is a mystery to me. Apparently he is amused by trying to lead people into some strange swr ideas and then arguing with them. The bigger mystery to me is jwr1945 who seems like a sincere person who really means what he says- until it comes to swr and rob bennett. I am not sure if he is a co-troll or just duped.
My usual practice has been to refer to the factors focused on in the conventional methodology SWR studies as "volatility" and to refer to the factor not given adequate consideration as "valuation." I have never been happy with these terms. I have been tempted at times to use the terms used by William Bernstein in Chapter Two of ?The Four Pillars of Investing?; he uses "risk" for the factors focused on in the conventional methodology studies, and "return" for the factor that I have been stressing.
here is a link for those who have tmf access
http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=20622477
My reason for posting it (and I think jwr's reson for asking ES to have it removed) is that it was posted using the same account as this:
The really funny thing was that there was this fellow SalaryGuru who tore all of the hoco-logic into tiny little bits. And hocus didn't have the excuse of claiming that there was disruption or deception or ridicule or personal attack on the thread. Dory36 made it clear early on that he wasn't going to stand for any of that stuff when he deleted one post that clearly went over the line. So even hocus had no choice in the end but to walk away like a dog with a tail between his legs. I got another good laugh out of that one!
http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=20617175
clearly hocus/rob bennett isn't dumb. why he derives enjoyment from being a troll and trying to get people to acknowledge his "insights" is a mystery to me. Apparently he is amused by trying to lead people into some strange swr ideas and then arguing with them. The bigger mystery to me is jwr1945 who seems like a sincere person who really means what he says- until it comes to swr and rob bennett. I am not sure if he is a co-troll or just duped.