Search found 6 matches
- Fri Aug 27, 2004 6:50 pm
- Forum: SWR Research Group
- Topic: Our Strong Theoretical Foundations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7841
- Wed Jun 30, 2004 10:21 am
- Forum: Town Center
- Topic: Congratulations
- Replies: 63
- Views: 83648
- Sat Jun 12, 2004 1:53 pm
- Forum: SWR Research Group
- Topic: The Facts about Hocus's Investment Decisions
- Replies: 22
- Views: 20870
John, Given that you're into revisionist history, can't you fault hocus for not having locking in his entire portfolio at 7%? Or he could have locked in his portfolio during the Carter administration, and had what at zero risk? Past actions can look good in hindsight, but it's a leap to think of you...
- Sat Jun 07, 2003 1:17 pm
- Forum: FIRE Board
- Topic: How will you use a "new/improved" swr analysis
- Replies: 49
- Views: 61996
I just came from reading postings on TMF FIRE board, and was refreshed by the absense of this pointless debate. Now I see a really excellent board in danger of being despoiled. I contend that the only true SWR is exactly 3.26595% and that exactly 5 billion angels can dance on the head of a pin. So t...
- Thu May 29, 2003 6:09 pm
- Forum: FIRE Board
- Topic: The Great SWR Investigation - Part 1
- Replies: 125
- Views: 88781
Raddar's caveats regarding potential impacts on predicting any SWR remind me of those so often found in technical papers. Bottom line, we can't predict anything with certainty, need more data and more analyses, so please renew our NSF grant for another three years. Hell, I've written those myself. I...
- Fri Dec 27, 2002 11:38 am
- Forum: FIRE Board
- Topic: REHP SWR Study Whinge...
- Replies: 5
- Views: 7231
SWR
Euro, I posted a reply at the TMF board. The concern you express has been of concern to me as well. I assume one will want to reset the basis for a SWR when changes in conditions warrant. My original plan had been to take a fixed percentage (4 or 5%) of our portfolio each year based on the value of ...